Harvard University

education 📍 Cambridge, United States
Harvard University
3
Lidocaine Infusion Publications
15
Lidocaine Infusion Researchers

Associated Institutions

Broad Institute
related
Cambridge Health Alliance
related
Brigham and Women's Hospital
related
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
related
Boston Children's Hospital
related

Publications

Short-Duration Systemic Lidocaine for the Management of Refractory Chronic Pain in Pediatrics.

Riley B, Shusterman C, O'Neil T, Donado C, Lobo K , et al.
Children (Basel, Switzerland)

Multidisciplinary management of chronic pain benefits many patients, although some continue to experience refractory pain. Administration of lidocaine infusions (LI) to manage certain chronic pain conditions has been reported in adults, but evidence is limited for its utility in managing pediatric chronic pain. We reviewed LIs for refractory pain in children to (1) describe the patient population that received LI and (2) evaluate the response to LI. With IRB approval, a retrospective review of patients receiving LI for refractory pain between 2016 and 2021 was conducted at Boston Children's Hospital. Demographic, medical, pain, sleep, and school function information was collected through self-report and from the electronic medical record. Longitudinal outcomes for a subset of these patients were analyzed using the Chronic Pain Repository database. During the study period, 3959 patients presented for management of chronic pain. Among this population, 184 (5%) patients aged 22 years or younger ultimately received LI as part of their pain management. A total of 350 LIs were administered and were well tolerated. During approximately 42% of the infusions, patients experienced an immediate statistically significant decrease in pain scores. Among the patients with follow-up data, pain improvement was not sustained. LI for the treatment of chronic pain appears safe and may be useful for managing refractory pain in pediatrics. Although approximately half of the patients who received LI reported an immediate positive response, the small follow-up sample did not show a continued response. Study limitations preclude demonstrating long-term efficacy of LI; therefore, a prospective study is critical.

Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusions as Opioid Adjunct for Children Hospitalized With Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Pain.

Agbakwuru U, AuBuchon JD, Toebe B, LaBarge A, Di Paola J , et al.
Pediatric blood & cancer

Sickle cell disease (SCD) vaso-occlusive episode (VOE) pain is treated with opioids, and non-opioid adjuvants may reduce pain severity without opioid side effects. We retrospectively investigated the safety and tolerability of intravenous lidocaine infusions as an adjunct to opioids in children and adolescents during VOE hospitalizations. In 2 years, lidocaine was administered in 64.6% of 260 admissions. There were no serious toxicities; overall, 82.2% of recipients chose to receive lidocaine during subsequent admissions. Lidocaine infusions were associated with longer hospitalizations, potentially reflecting selection bias. The efficacy of adjuvant lidocaine infusions during VOE should be studied prospectively.

The use of lidocaine infusion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Awan B, Elsaigh M, Elkomos BE, Sohail A, Asqalan A , et al.
Journal of minimal access surgery

Being one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures, numerous techniques have been adapted to decrease post-operative pain post cholecystectomy. However, the efficacy of intravenous (IV) lidocaine in managing post operative pain after LC is still controversial, according to many recent studies. This study aims to detect the effectiveness of IV lidocaine compared to other medications in managing post-operative pain. PubMed, Scopes, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies from inception to June 2023, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was done. According to eligibility criteria, 14 studies (898 patients) were included in our study. The pooled results of the included studies showed that the pain score after 6, 12 and 24 h after the surgery was significantly lower in those who received IV lidocaine as a painkiller (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] 6H, mean difference [MD] = -1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.20, -0.20, P = 0.02; I2 = 98%, VAS 12H, MD = -0.90, 95% CI = -1.52, -0.29, P = 0.004; I2 = 96% and VAS 24H, MD = -0.86, 95% CI = -1.48, -0.24, P = 0.007; I2 = 92%). In addition, IV lidocaine is associated with a significant decrease in the opioid requirement after the surgery (opioid requirements, MD = -29.53, 95% CI = -55.41, -3.66, P = 0.03; I2 = 98%). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting after the surgery between the two groups (nausea and vomiting, relative risk = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.57, 1.45, P = 0.69; I2 = 50%). Lidocaine infusion in LC is associated with a significant decrease in post operative pain and in opioid requirements after the surgery.