Xiang Yang No.1 People's Hospital

healthcare 📍 Xiangfan, China
2
Lidocaine Infusion Publications
1
Lidocaine Infusion Researchers

Associated Institutions

Hubei University of Medicine
related

Lidocaine Infusion Researchers

Publications

Efficacy and safety of lidocaine versus sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Wu Y, Tian B, Li L, Liu R, Zhang Z , et al.
BMC anesthesiology •

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lidocaine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with sufentanil-based PCIA for managing postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. A total of 126 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to lidocaine group (group L, n = 63) or the sufentanil group (group S, n = 63). The primary endpoint was visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score during movement at 24 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints included VAS pain scores at rest and during movement at 6, 12, 36, and 48 h after surgery, the time of first flatus and defecation after the surgery, postoperative hospitalization time and total hospitalization costs, patient satisfaction scores, and the incidence of adverse events. There was no significant difference between the two groups in VAS pain scores at rest and during movement at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after surgery (all p > 0.05). The time to first flatus and defecation, as well as postoperative hospitalization time and total hospitalization expenses, were also similar between the two groups (all p > 0.05). However, satisfaction score was significantly higher in group L compared to group S (p < 0.05), and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower in group L than in group S (p < 0.05). Lidocaine-based PCIA can effectively relieve postoperative pain, decrease the incidence of PONV, and improve patient satisfaction in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) with the registration number ChiCTR2300068854, with the registration date being March 1, 2023.

Lidocaine-Based vs Sufentanil-Based PCIA After Pulmonary Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Tian B, Wu Y, Zhang W, Liu R, Qu S , et al.
Drug design, development and therapy •

We investigated the efficacy and safety of lidocaine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), compared with sufentanil-based PCIA on postoperative pain and recovery quality in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery. We recruited 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery who were randomized to receive lidocaine-based PCIA (1.5 mg/kg/h) or sufentanil-based PCIA (2 μg/mL) within 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint was visual analogue scores (VAS) pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores and other prespecified endpoints were also recorded. VAS pain scores at rest and during coughing in the lidocaine group were significantly lower at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (<0.05), with no difference at 48 hours (0.05). QoR-15 scores in the lidocaine group were higher on postoperative day (POD) 1 (<0.001) and POD2 (<0.001), with significant differences in the two dimensions of postoperative physical comfort and pain (<0.001). The lidocaine group also experienced a shorter time to first flatus, defecation, and ambulation (<0.05), with no difference in the length of postoperative hospitalization and thoracic drainage time (0.05). The serum IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, cortisol, and epinephrine concentrations were lower in the lidocaine group on POD1 and POD2 (<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the lidocaine group was lower (<0.05), with no differences in other adverse events (>0.05). Compared with sufentanil-based PCIA, lidocaine-based PCIA significantly relieved postoperative pain and improved recovery quality after thoracoscopic lung surgery with fewer postoperative adverse events, which is a considerable choice for postoperative analgesia. This study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 1st, 2023 (number ChiCTR2300068840).