Wang F

Qinghai University

2
Publications
17
h-index
(900 citations, 85 total works)

Research Topics

Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (19) Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (15) Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (12) Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (12) Congenital Heart Disease Studies (8)

Lidocaine Infusion Publications

Effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy: a study protocol of double-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Wang F, Zhang H, Peng X, Liu M, Wang H , et al.
Trials

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most prevalent malignant tumor in the world and has the sixth highest mortality rate. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are one of the most common complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The non-local anesthetic effects of lidocaine have been widely reported, but only a few studies have focused on its effects on lung protection in MIE. This study is designed to test the hypothesis that intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion can reduce the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing MIE. In this double-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled superiority trial, 770 participants from three centers will be randomly assigned to two groups, namely the lidocaine group and the placebo group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the incidence of PPCs within 7 days following surgery. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of (1) respiratory infection; (2) respiratory failure; (3) pneumothorax; (4) atelectasis; (5) pleural effusion; (6) bronchospasm; (7) aspiration pneumonitis; (8) anastomotic fistula; (9) moderate to severe pain within 24 and 48 h at rest and when coughing; (10) additional rescue analgesics use. This study aims to address a significant gap in the prevention of PPCs in patients undergoing MIE for esophageal cancer. PPCs are common and can negatively impact recovery and survival outcomes, making effective prevention strategies crucial. While lidocaine's non-local anesthetic properties, including anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects, have been well-documented, few studies have focused on its role in lung protection during MIE. By assessing the incidence of PPCs and other secondary outcomes, this trial seeks to determine whether intraoperative lidocaine infusion can offer a novel, non-invasive approach to reducing PPC risk and improving overall postoperative recovery. If lidocaine proves effective, this study will provide a new way to improve patient outcomes, particularly for those with high PPCs risk. Furthermore, the results could expand the scope of lidocaine use in surgical settings, suggesting a potentially low-cost and accessible intervention for broader perioperative lung protection. NCT06138041 (ClinicalTrials.gov, registration date: 2024-10-22). This study will provide a reliable conclusion investigating the effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. The study includes an appropriate sample size and a double-center, randomized, and double-blind placebo-controlled design, which reduces potential bias. The full analysis set consists of all participants according to the intention-to-treat principle and the per-protocol set will be both performed. Per-protocol analysis will be used for sensitivity analyses. Intravenous lidocaine infusion is only continued until patients are transferred out of the post-anesthesia care unit, while the benefit of prolonged infusion in the ward will not be investigated.

Postoperative analgesic effect of intravenous coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine in gynaecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xie D, Wang F, Wen W, Li H
BMJ open

Hysterectomy or myomectomy is a common gynaecological procedure that results in moderate to severe acute postoperative pain, which can cause many adverse effects. This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy, opioid consumption, quality of postoperative recovery (QOR) and adverse reactions of intravenous coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine or dexmedetomidine alone in gynaecological surgery. Systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were used to access the articles. Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies published before 1 May 2024. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the final analysis in which the intraoperative intervention group received intravenous coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine, and the control group received intravenous injection of lidocaine or dexmedetomidine alone in gynaecologic procedures. Study retrieval, literature screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (ROB V.2.0). Data were expressed as standardised mean difference, weighted mean difference or relative risk with 95% CI. Review Manager V.5.4 was used for data analysis. A total of five RCTs were included, involving 672 patients, of which 224 patients received coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine. The results revealed that coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine was superior to individual lidocaine in the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 1 hour (MD=-0.90, 95% CI (-1.11 to -0.69), p<0.001), 2 hours (MD=-0.99, 95% CI (-1.19 to -0.80), p<0.001), 4 hours (MD=-1.20, 95% CI (-1.75 to -0.66), p<0.001), 6 hours (MD=-1.09, 95% CI (-1.48 to -0.70), p<0.001), 8 hours (MD=-1.22, 95% CI (-1.61 to -0.83), p<0.001) and 12 hours (MD=-0.76, 95% CI (-1.35 to -0.17), p=0.o1) after surgery. Compared with the dexmedetomidine group, the lidocaine+dexmedetomidine group had low VAS scores at 1 hour (MD=-0.60, 95% CI (-0.83 to -0.37), p<0.001), 2 hours (MD=-0.70, 95% CI (-0.87 to -0.53), p<0.001), 6 hours (MD=-0.79, 95% CI (-0.98 to -0.59), p<0.001), 8 hours (MD=-0.77, 95% CI (-1.25 to -0.28), p=0.002) and 12 hours (MD=-0.56, 95% CI (-1.00 to -0.11), p=0.01) after surgery. Coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine resulted in significantly lower postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting and bradycardia than lidocaine alone (all p<0.05). Compared with the dexmedetomidine group, the lidocaine+dexmedetomidine group shortened the time to intestinal transit resumption (p=0.003). Coinjection of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine reduced intraoperative opioid consumption and increased QOR scores compared with lidocaine and dexmedetomidine alone (all p<0.05). Lidocaine combined with dexmedetomidine had superior analgesic efficacy and safety. However, due to the limitation in the number of available studies, more large-scale, prospective RCTs are needed for further investigation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023384018.