Chen L

Shanxi Medical University

2
Publications
0
h-index
(0 citations, 1 total works)

Research Topics

Anesthesia and Pain Management (1) Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1) Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1)

Lidocaine Infusion Publications

Effect of Intraoperative Intravenous Lidocaine on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Feng X, Jia J, Sang Y, Zhao Y, Wang Z , et al.
Drug design, development and therapy

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative intravenous (IV) lidocaine on the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients undergoing major spinal surgery. In this prospective, single-center randomized clinical trial, elderly patients scheduled for elective posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with instrumentation spanning two or more vertebral segments were enrolled. A total of 270 patients were randomized to receive either intravenous lidocaine (Group L) or saline (Group C). Group L received lidocaine at a bolus dose of 1.5 mg/kg before induction, followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/h until the end of surgery, while Group C received an equivalent volume of saline. All patients underwent standardized general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) within 5 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included delirium severity, onset, duration, and subtype (hypoactive, hyperactive, or mixed), postoperative visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100 mm) pain scores, intraoperative anesthetic consumption, 24-hour sufentanil consumption and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) attempts, and perioperative adverse events. The lidocaine group had a lower incidence of postoperative delirium (8.9% vs 20.7%; RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.81; < 0.05). Among patients who developed delirium, the duration was comparable between groups, while severity scores were higher and time to onset was shorter in the control group. Within the first 24 hours postoperatively, the lidocaine group had lower VAS scores, fewer PCIA attempts, and a reduced cumulative sufentanil dose. Opioid-related adverse events, including nausea and vomiting, were less frequent, with no cases of local anesthetic toxicity, and the overall hospital stay was comparable. In elderly patients undergoing PLIF, intraoperative intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg administered before induction, followed by continuous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/h until the end of surgery) lowered the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD) within the first 5 days after surgery.

Systemic lidocaine versus erector spinae plane block for improving quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Lin Z, Chen C, Xie S, Chen L, Yao Y , et al.
Journal of clinical anesthesia

To compare intravenous lidocaine, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and placebo on the quality of recovery and analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, triple-arm, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial. A single tertiary academic medical center. 126 adults aged 18-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: intravenous lidocaine infusion (1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by 2 mg/kg/h) plus bilateral ESPB with saline (25 mL per side); bilateral ESPB with 0.25% ropivacaine (25 ml per side) plus placebo infusion; or bilateral ESPB with saline (25 ml per side) plus placebo infusion. The primary outcome was the 24-h postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. The non-inferiority of lidocaine versus ESPB was assessed with a margin of -6 points and 97.5% confidence interval (CI). Secondary outcomes included 24-h area under the curve (AUC) for pain scores, morphine consumption, and adverse events. 124 patients completed the study. Median (IQR) 24-h QoR-15 scores were 123 (117-127) for lidocaine, 124 (119-126) for ESPB, and 112 (108-117) for placebo. Lidocaine was non-inferior to ESPB (median difference  -1, 97.5% CI: -4 to ∞). Both lidocaine (median difference 9, 95% CI: 6-12, P < 0.001) and ESPB (median difference 10, 95% CI: 7-13, P < 0.001) were superior to placebo. AUC for pain scores and morphine use were lower with lidocaine and ESPB versus placebo (P < 0.001 for all), with no significant differences between lidocaine and ESPB. One ESPB patient reported a transient metallic taste; no other block-related complications occurred. For patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intravenous lidocaine provides a non-inferior quality of recovery compared to ESPB without requiring specialized regional anesthesia procedures. Lidocaine may offer a practical and accessible alternative within multimodal analgesia pathways.